Olivia Brown · Built with Codus

Olivia Brown

Six hundred and nine commits, and more than half of them landed inside a single eight-day window.

A live product rebuilt with Codus. The average across the project hides the real story: the rebuild was a concentrated burst at roughly forty commits a day, across forty four branches.

Visit the live product

The run

10 Apr

First commit

The project opens.

29 May

The burst begins

35 commits in a day, after weeks of quiet.

31 May

Peak day

59 commits, the busiest single day in the repository.

5 Jun

Burst ends

320 commits banked in 8 days, 52.5% of the project.

31 Jul

Last commit

112 days from first to last, 54 of them active.

10 Apr
First commit
The project opens.
29 May
The burst begins
35 commits in a day, after weeks of quiet.
31 May
Peak day
59 commits, the busiest single day in the repository.
5 Jun
Burst ends
320 commits banked in 8 days, 52.5% of the project.
31 Jul
Last commit
112 days from first to last, 54 of them active.

The receipts

320

Commits in the 8-day rebuild burst

git log --since=2026-05-29 --until=2026-06-06

52.5%

Share of the whole project, in those 8 days

320 of 609 commits

Commits on the single busiest day

31 May 2026, git log --format=%ad | uniq -c

609

Commits in total

git rev-list --count HEAD

Branches

git branch -a

Active build days, across a 112-day span

distinct commit dates

Every figure counted from the project’s git history on 2026-08-08. The eight-day window is 29 May to 5 June 2026 inclusive.

Olivia Brown is a live product that was rebuilt with Codus. The headline number is six hundred and nine commits, but the average across the project is the least interesting way to read it, because the work was not spread evenly. It arrived in a burst.

Half the project in eight days

Between 29 May and 5 June, three hundred and twenty commits landed. That is fifty two and a half per cent of everything the repository has ever contained, inside a single eight-day window. The peak day, 31 May, carried fifty nine commits on its own.

For context, the project spans a hundred and twelve days from first commit to last, but only fifty four of those days have any commit at all. The shape is not a steady trickle. It is a long quiet period punctuated by a concentrated rebuild, which is what parallel agents look like in a git history: when the work is running, it runs very fast, and when it is not, nothing moves.

Why the burst is the story

A three and a half month average would put this at roughly five commits a day, which sounds like an ordinary side project. The distribution says something quite different. Forty commits a day sustained across an eight-day rebuild is a throughput a single developer does not reach, and it is the number that actually describes how the work happened.

Forty four branches across the same period tell the parallel half of the story: work proceeding on several fronts at once rather than down a single trunk.

The site is live. Every figure on this page came out of the repository with git log, and the commands are named beside each one so you can run them yourself.